UK time is: 06:21:42
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

One From My Inbox

We don't normally publish emails, but every now and then we get a cracker and earlier this week I received in my inbox a passionate defence of Ian Holloway's actions against Aston Villa from a good mate of mine; Jonathan Fitzgerald.

Now he's a Man United fan, but don't hold that against him as he makes some very pertinent points. Jonathan, the stage is yours...


Brilliant interview by Ollie (the manager, not the octopus).

Whilst there is certainly a case for Ollie learning to control himself a bit more, he's once again absolutely right. You declare your squad of 25 players by submitting it to the FA at the start of the season. How you then use those players is entirely up to you within your own circumstances and demands. It's not as if Blackpool rolled over and got thrashed against Villa, they nearly got something out of the game. How ridiculous would it be if a team made 10 changes, drew or even won a game, and still got charged?!

So - what is the FA's criteria here? If they based it on the 'number of changes' from the previous game, that would be a joke - there's no official limit set, some of the changes may have been enforced, others may be changing BACK to previously unavailable first-choice players, or you might just be really lucky and have a very strong squad where you aren't sure about your first 11 so want to give lots of players the chance to play. Or, if you just want to protect key players for bigger games ahead, that's up to you as a boss and is sensible 'management' of the tools you have to do your job.

Or will the FA base it on whether the changes brought the game into disrepute/affected the value of the game from a fans' perspective? How do you define that? A narrow 3-2 defeat - no. How about a 3-0 defeat, but the 'weakened' team played really well and those 3 goals only went in during the last few minutes? Or a 1-0 defeat in which the 'weakened' team were appauling, but so were the opposition? It's so subjective, you just can't do it, you can't draw a line anywhere!

Or will the FA base it on whether the opposition complain? Villa didn't - and had no right to after the game they were given. On the flipside, if you played against a weakened team that WERE rubbish and you thrashed them, what's the motive for complaint? So then other teams in the league might complain - the same teams that could then do exactly the same thing themselves at a future time.

Any charge in my view would therefore be totally flawed. That is all. Goodnight.


What do you think of Jonathan's viewpoint? As always, you can debate to your heart's content on our messageboard...




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The journalist

Writer: Eamonn Moore  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday November 13 2010

Time: 8:27AM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
I think that this is a very sensible and reasoned article. Like the majority of Premier League managers who have stood behind Ollie the thought of the authorities interfering is just not needed. As long as the players are in the squad I see no problem.
SFC Forever
Report Abuse
13/11/2010 14:30:00

Rubbish-The Premier League has a duty to ensure all teams field their strongest teams for the sake of fairness and transparency. Although some may deem it too subjective, any fule should know 10 changes is going to incur the curiosity of those tasked with maintaining the rules. Don't tell me Holloway doesn't know his strongest 11. And he ought to apologise to Pat Murphy, a gent of a reporter, who didn't deserve the incoherent tirade he received for merely asking the questions.
lordjohnny
Report Abuse
17/11/2010 17:17:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Blackpool Articles

Madine Not Ruling Out Blackpool Stay (Saturday March 28 2015)

McMahon Makes Bradford Move (Thursday March 26 2015)

Dunne Enjoying Life At Blackpool (Thursday March 26 2015)

Quiet Day At Bloomfield Road? (Thursday March 26 2015)

An Untenable Position (Tuesday March 24 2015)

Charge For Oyston Over Texts (Monday March 23 2015)

Madine On Leeds Point (Sunday March 22 2015)

Archived Blackpool Articles

List All Vital Blackpool Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. premier 1 364
2. SeasideEssexXile 261
3. Bear1951 235
4. Layton_Seasider 156
5. BobHatton 140
6. Albert Ramsbottom 135
7. SaskPool 125
8. 53CODGER 73
9. Bremen-Seasider 62
10. SmartBloke 60

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
18. Huddersfield 39 11 11 17 -19 44
19. Reading 38 12 8 18 -19 44
20. Fulham 39 12 7 20 -18 43
21. Rotherham 39 9 13 17 -20 40
22. Wigan 39 8 11 20 -17 35
23. Millwall 39 7 12 20 -31 33
24. Blackpool 39 4 11 24 -48 23

Breaking League News

LUFC Leeds amongst the form teams in February
Leeds Utd : 30/03/2015 20:43:00
Meet The Ref - Boro v Latics - Stuart Attwell
Wigan : 30/03/2015 19:57:01
Write For Vital Bolton
Bolton : 30/03/2015 19:41:01
The Price Of Prising McClaren Away
Derby County : 30/03/2015 18:29:00
Royals hit with Football League fine
Reading : 30/03/2015 18:23:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Leeds MotM
Suggested By:  Site Staff
Lewis 1%
Hall 0%
Clarke 0%
O'Dea 33%
Dunne 0%
Cubero Loria 0%
Addison 0%
Perkins 0%
Orlandi 66%
Madine 0%
Jacobs 0%